(This post is my full response to the articles “Why gay marriage should be legalized: Part 2” and “Christian College or Liberal University” in Mercer University's newspaper The Cluster. I sent the full response to The Cluster originally but then had to shorten it for spaces requirements. )
Having read both articles and various responses to the latter article on Facebook threads of other Mercer students, I would like to address what I believe are the key reasons for the polarization on the issues of gay marriage being legalized and Mercer University endorsing homosexuality. This is just a fringe issue, of many others that are frequently debated, that is based on a few critical presuppositional beliefs. To be a Christian means (among several other key things) to believe that the Bible is the inspired, infallible Word of God, and if you are going to claim it (and Christianity) as your point of reference you must refer to it as your source of morality, ethics, etc. With that stated you simply cannot refer to the APA (American Psychological Association) or any other human source as your lens for interpreting human nature or what is right or wrong. If you do not believe that the Bible is true and that it is inspired of God then it is of the same good as Aesop’s fables for application to one’s life. In summary, your source of authority (either the Bible or your own ideals) will greatly shape your belief system and what you think about this issue.
Also, it is very important to understand the context of the passages of Scripture that are quoted. Just as references to the FFC or the UC would make sense only in the context of Mercer, quotations from the Bible will only be understood correctly if framed in the proper context (i.e. author, recipient, purpose of writing, etc.). Scripture can be and is taken out of context frequently and interpreted to say things that it ultimately does not say. In addition to framing Scripture within its original context when quoted, I think it is also essential to define what is meant by “love,” “marriage,” “sin,” etc. Depending on your source of authority these terms (among many others) can come to mean drastically different things. For example, our culture is seeking to redefine the term "marriage" to fit the sexuality and desires of its constituents. The problem is that God has clearly defined marriage as a lifelong union between one man and one woman (Genesis 2, Ephesians 5). So, one must decide if they will accept the culture's view of marriage or if they will trust God's revelation about the subject.
In terms of the issue at hand, an important distinction that must be made is whether homosexuality is a sin or rather something that someone is “born into.” If the Bible is your source of authority then you must believe that homosexuality is a sin (1 Corinthians 6:9-11, Romans 1:26-27, Leviticus 18:22 & 20:13). The Bible presents homosexuality as a perversion of sex that departs from the natural, created order and includes heterosexual lust, sex out of wedlock, incest, etc. These are all departures from the created order of marriage being for one man and one woman for life and sex being meant only for the marriage relationship (Genesis 2). These are all examples of sexual sin. Whether heterosexual or homosexual, it is all the same.
According to the Bible, sin is inherited by all people as a result of man's fall from perfection in the Garden of Eden (see Genesis 3). We are all guilty of sinning (breaking the law of God, whether that law be specified in Scripture or written on our hearts) and are enemies of God facing His judgment. Only by placing trust in the purposefully sacrificial and humbling act of God dying on the Cross and being resurrected can anyone be saved from judgment. From the Biblical perspective, all people start off in the same situation and can only be saved by God's grace -- regardless if you struggle with homosexual sin or heterosexual sin. The judgment of God falls on the sinner because of their sin, and that is why Jesus came: to redeem sinners from their sin in the various ways it manifests itself.
In summary, the Biblical perspective does not condone homosexuality. But, Scripture insists that those struggling with homosexual sin be treated no differently than anyone else who struggles with any other sin. This means EVERYONE. In this is found the beauty of the good news of Christ, that He came to save sinners of all types and that His sacrifice is sufficient to cleanse anyone of their sin and bring them into an intimate relationship with God (2 Corinthians 5:21). If Mercer University claims to represent Christian ideals, namely the Bible, then they cannot promote student organizations that celebrate sin, in this case in the form of homosexual lifestyles. But Mercer here seems to depart with the evangelical stance that its forefathers wholeheartedly embraced. If this was a premarital sex club or an adultery club, Mercer would have stopped this dialogue long ago. The question must be asked: who is the authority here, the culture or God's Word?
Lastly, we should not discriminate against students merely because they struggle with homosexuality. The Scriptures are clear that our calling as Christians is to love (Luke 10:27). If you claim the Bible as the foundation of your belief system, you cannot support gay marriage, homosexual lifestyles, or any other sexual sin. But on the flip-side you cannot discriminate, attack, snub, or ridicule a person struggling with homosexual sin because you are guilty in the same degree.
Pleasing Pain has become The Publican
12 years ago